Report of the Supreme Audit Office

State property and state budget funds earmarked for safeguarding the activities of the National Security Authority

The aim of the inspection was to examine the management of state property and state budget funds at the National Security Office.
The audited entity was the National Security Authority (NBÚ). The audited period covered the years 2000 to 2004 and, in the case of factual contexts, the previous year.
The weaknesses identified by the audit concerned the following:

Compliance with Act No 218/2000 on budgetary rules and amending certain related acts (budgetary rules)

1)
Between 2001 and 2003, the NBÚ did not pay to the State budget all the income obtained in the course of its management, thereby infringing budgetary discipline. At the same time, as a result of these negotiations in those years, it distorted by 15 to 38 % the data submitted in the draft state final account of Chapter 308 - National Security Office in the area of revenue.

2,1)
Between 1999 and 2004, the SAO violated budgetary discipline by using improperly the resources of the state budget of the Republic for a total amount of 51 020 thousand. CZK It did not use those funds in accordance with the benefits in kind or used them contrary to the purpose for which they were intended by the Law on the State Budget.

2,2)
In view of the findings of improper use of state budget funds, it can be concluded that the budget of the NSA was overstated in the current expenditure line by at least 30 % in 2002 and by at least 63 % in 2003. The NBÚ paid for the acquisition or technical improvement of fixed assets from current expenditure. The budget did not correspond to the actual needs of the NSA, which would have been significantly lower in the area of current expenditure if the NSA had respected the principles of the activities of central government bodies consisting in compliance with generally binding legislation.

2,3)
In 2003 and 2004, the SAO did not finance the reproduction of assets from its budget within the set binding indicators of programme financing.

3)
In the management of state budget funds in 2002 and 2003, the NSA violated the statutory obligation to perform specified tasks in the most economical manner and to use state budget funds to cover the necessary needs.

Compliance with Act No 563/1991 on accounting

4)
The NBÚ did not keep correct, complete and conclusive accounts during the audited period. Furthermore, the fact that the NSA did not keep all the assets in its accounts during the audited period led to a distortion of the figures reported by the NSA in its balance sheet.

Compliance with Act No 119/2002, the Weapons Act

5)
In 2003 and 2004, the NSA did not keep records of part of the ammunition in accordance with Implementing Decree No 384/2002 on the implementation of certain provisions of the Weapons Act.

Compliance with Act No 320/2001 on financial control in public administration and amending certain acts

The SAO's audit showed that financial control was not organised in the SAO's terms and conditions during the audited period in such a way as to ensure reasonable assurance that such control provides timely and reliable information on management, which is the basis for ensuring effective management of the performance of public administration in the fulfilment of approved plans and objectives.

Mgr. Marie Hošková,
Member of the SAO College