Opinion of the National Security Authority on the SAO report

The National Security Authority (NSA) was established on 1 November 1998. The audited period was 2000-2004. The NSA was based in temporary premises and moved to a new building in mid-2001.

Violation of the budgetary rules established by the SAO does not mean that any funds from the state budget have been evaded or misappropriated, but only that these funds have not been used in accordance with the budgetary rules. There was therefore no theft or disappearance of money from the state budget or any other property.

1)
The alleged failure to pay certain revenues to the State budget constitutes, in practice, the receipt of funds from the manufacturers of the equipment, which the NSA then paid to the authors of the research activity. In our opinion, the state budget was not shortened in any way, on the contrary, we were guided by an effort to save money. The situation has been remedied since 1 January 2005; the NBÚ transfers the received funds to the state budget and the state then pays them in the same amount through the NBÚ, i.e. its budget, to the authors.

2.1; 2.2; 2,3)
The allegation of a breach of budgetary discipline consisted in the use by the NSA of funds classified in current expenditure for the development of software, for which it was required to reserve investment funds. Objectively, however, we have to state that for about 50 million, a unique database application has been created, which has no equivalent in its functionality both within the Czech Republic and within NATO and EU member states. The effective use of funds, albeit from a different budget line, is clearly documented here.

3)
The SAO also accused us of wasteful use of funds. It was mainly an atypical entrance area, where all - even foreign - visits are handled and for security reasons it was necessary to rebuild and expand it. In our view, this was a security-necessary expense.

4)
It also alleged a breach of the Accounting Act, which in practice constitutes a discrepancy between accounting and material records, but not any loss or untraceability. The responsible worker was reassigned to another, less paid, job.

5)
The SAO also complained about shortcomings in the records of dispensing and receipt of ammunition, i.e. inconsistency with the regulations on the handling of weapons and ammunition. There was a failure of the human factor, there was no finding of manco or unauthorized disposal of ammunition, it was really just an administrative inconsistency. Here, the director of the NSA Jan Mareš tightened the management control of ammunition management and at the same time the responsible employee was significantly financially affected.

In order to remedy the shortcomings identified, the director of the NSA, Jan Mareš, took a number of measures of a personnel, payroll and system nature. Some of the managers who were responsible for complying with all the rules were removed from their posts, while others were reassigned to other jobs.
Furthermore, Jan Mareš affected directly responsible workers on their salary, which in total represents a reduction of more than CZK 130,000.
Some of the shortcomings identified had already been remedied in the course of the inspection. In addition, the Director of the Office took substantial measures to ensure that the shortcomings complained of did not recur - internal management acts were redrafted.
Control mechanisms to prevent similar deficiencies were further strengthened and an additional control officer was recruited.

Aneta Kupková
spokesperson of the NBÚ